Health Care

I was poking around the web the other day, and came across this article, which features this remarkable statement in its close:

And [the failure of healthcare reform to advance along the author’s preferred lines] means that America‚Äôs industrial corporations will continue to suffer from a competitive disadvantage with manufacturers based in civilized countries where health care is considered a public trust and a right and the government pays the bill.

For me, this raised, as they say, all kinds of questions.

Questions

If we “re-form” the U.S. healthcare system:

  • Is the new system supposed to provide more or less total healthcare to the United States than the old?
  • If less, will not this likely be a change for the worse from the standpoint of the sick?
  • If more (or even the same amount) of healthcare is provided, is it reasonable to assume that a ‘single-payer’ system (i.e. the government) will provide services at a lower cost than the current, more-or-less-free-market system? (Remember that this is the same gov’t that brought you the $200 DoD hammer.)
  • Since the gov’t produces nothing (it merely collects and spends other people’s money) won’t any new healthcare regime that provides the same or a higher level of care than we enjoy today consume a larger portion of our economy, albeit in taxes rather than direct spending?
  • If we’re spending, as a society, the same or more money on healthcare, doesn’t an assumption that businesses will pay less imply that the individual citizen pays more?
  • Since when has the rallying cry of the left been: “Citizens should subsidize business expenses!”?

Faith

Of course, one could always suppose that a centrally-planned and administered healthcare system will be so much more efficient than our current distributed one that it will be able to provide the same (or a higher) level of care at a reduced price, and that this lower price will simultaneously reduce the apparent costs of healthcare to both businesses and individuals. Also: no rationing!

If one believes this, one has a lot more faith in the power of central planning than I do. I think centrally-planned systems tend more towards inefficiency at best, and cronyism and corruption in the typical case. I’d rather not deal with either when I’m feeling under the weather.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • HackerNews
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
This entry was posted in Jack Handy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.